Tagged: England RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Michael Coxon 2:19 pm on November 18, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: England,   

    My Euro 2012 XI: Michael Coxon 

    GK: Scott Carson…only kidding, of course the choice for goalkeeper is Joe Hart.

    When you think back to the 90s, England had Seaman, Martyn, Flowers, James, Walker, Pressman…yes a few of those reputations may have faded but in that list were two genuinely top class keepers (people forget just how good Nigel Martyn was), two very good top flight goalkeepers and two solid if unspectacular top class keepers. Now who do we have at our disposal?

    The aforementioned Carson is currently playing in Turkey for Bursaspor who stand 12th in the 11th best league in Europe. He started his career so promisingly with Leeds, Liverpool and on loan at Charlton and Villa, but lo things haven’t quite panned out. And besides he looks permanently shellacked at international level, another blunder just waiting to happen.

    And it gets worse. Rob Green has gone in on himself since that howler in South Africa, Ben Foster and Paul Robinson are both in international exile, David Stockdale and Frankie Fielding are un-tested and playing in the Championship and John Ruddy looks good but has a long way to go after an impressive start this season to show he’s international class. How long before the names David James or Chris Kirkland are bandied about?! And are we still checking to see if Manuel Almunia is eligible?

    Luckily we have Hart, a truly top class goalkeeper. Let’s hope City have lost the title by March so they can rest him for the rest of the season (the alternative, them having won the league by then, doesn’t bear thinking about). If he gets injured then we are well and truly screwed.

    RB: Chris Smalling

    For years England only had one right back – Gary Neville (I think I’ve mentioned him before?). When he was injured we had to resort to the likes of Wes Brown, Luke Young, Danny Mills or Phil Neville as back up, or play the likes of Jamie Carragher and Owen Hargreaves out of position to fill in. Not ideal, and thus it was consistently one of England’s weaker positions.

    But not anymore. Now it is perhaps our strongest place and that’s why it’s so hard to pick. Five men are in the frame – Glen Johnson, Kyle Walker, Micah Richards, Chris Smalling and Phil Jones.

    Straight away I’m ruling Jones out. He can do a very good job at right back but Capello will use him elsewhere and frankly he’s better elsewhere. I still think that, if he has a strong second half of the season, he’ll start alongside Terry as the ball-playing centre half. Likewise it will take Micah Richards an awful lot of fortune to take the spot. It seems Capello doesn’t fancy him, which is strange given that he can play centre half or right back and is playing regularly for the current Premier League leaders.

    So that leaves us with Walker, Smalling and Johnson. And club allegiance aside I’m going for Smalling. Walker was great against an average Sweden side but he’s inexperienced at the highest level which will count against him. Johnson, to borrow from a well known light-hearted football site who pump out quality stuff (almost) 365 days of the year, is great going forward but awful going back, plus he’s facing increased competition for his club place from Martin Kelly (again, the Euros will come to soon but another great right back for the future). So for me it’s Smalling. Champions League experience, Premier League winner and when everyone’s fit I think he’ll be United’s first choice right back. Capello plumped for him over the rest against Bulgaria and Wales and when everyone is fit I think that will continue.

    LB: Ashley Cole

    Again, really, who else? Leighton Baines is a great left-back but he lacks the experience and class of Cole. You might not like him but he’s the best we’ve got and unless he suffers some serious injury problems in the next few years he’ll probably overtake Peter Shilton as our best capped player. That will be horrible.

    Alternatives? Aside from Baines you’ve got Joleon Lescott (a centre back), Stephen Warnock (average), Kieran Gibbs (injury prone), Martin Kelly (really a right back)…and that’s about it, unless someone wants to call Phil Neville?

    CB: Phil Jones

    Capello is clearly a big fan and he’s getting a lot of game time both in the league and Champions League. I see Jones being groomed as the future and getting the ball playing centre half role, especially after the comparisons to Hierro and Baresi this week. He’s also got the perfect mentor at club level in Rio Ferdinand.

    Rio himself will still want to be first choice, and if he stays fit for the rest of the season maybe he will be, but the only way I can see him making the squad is an injury/racist shaming for John Terry (he’s not going to take two old carthorses). Joleon Lescott and Phil Jagielka resumed their excellent partnership from the Everton days at the weekend and will be a good shout to go given that both are versatile (to the extent that Jagielka is probably 4th choice keeper at the moment) but I think Gary Cahill might be the unfortunate one to miss out given his lack of versatility and experience. A shame because he’s performed well whenever called upon at international level.

    CB: John Terry

    It’s an if, and a very big if. If John Terry is cleared of all racism charges (and we’ve all seen the youtube video) then he will lead England into the Euros. Otherwise I fully expect a centre half pairing of Rio Ferdinand and Phil Jones. If he is cleared however then I expect Rio to be left at home altogether (give the younger, more versatile lads some experience) and “JT” (shudder) to captain us. Not sure how I’d feel about him raising the trophy but there you go.

    CM: Scott Parker

    It’s a straight shoot out between Scott Parker and Gareth Barry in midfield and the only advantage Barry has is that he’s left footed.

    That’s not to say that Barry is poor, to be fair to him he’s come on leaps and bounds since South Africa for both club and country, but Parker is just what the England midfield needs. He looks like he’d run himself into the ground for his country (and regularly does so), and for a defensive midfield spoiler he’s got as good a shot and range of passing as I’ve seen.

    The only alternatives that are arguably good enough are the perennially unfit Owen Hargreaves and the perennially offensive Joey Barton. Unless either has a spectacular run up to the season it already looks like a lost cause. Likewise Michael Carrick looks like his international career is over, I’m sure many will shed a tear…

    CM: Jack Wilshere

    The slightly more attacking central midfielder, the Pirlo to Parker’s Gattuso if you will, will be Jack Wilshere…if he’s fit. Frank Lampard gets a lot of stick but very few midfielders have his record at club and international level and he will go to the Euros. But the young, dynamic Wilshere should start, especially if he’s managed to string a good run together for Arsenal.

    Behind those two there’s Tom Cleverley, who will be cursing the London riots for cancelling his debut opportunity and his injuries for falling behind Jack Rodwell in the pecking order. Rodwell looked like a breath of fresh air but if everyone is fit and firing I think he’ll miss out. Jordan Henderson will pay the price for a slow start at Liverpool but he’ll get his chance to shine at the Olympics.

    AM: Steven Gerrard

    Another big question mark. If he’s fit, he’ll be England’s driving force in the absence of Rooney. If he’s not we best hope that there’s someone to fill the gap until Rooney returns, should we make it through.

    The only other player who could fill this role is Ashley Young. He has the skill, vision, drive and attitude, plus Stewart Downing is just waiting to come in one the left. But Gerrard’s track record and drive mean he’ll play an essential role in any England success.

    RW: James Milner

    A favourite of mine, despite the foul shirt he currently wears at club level. Milner has pace, skill and goalscoring ability in buckets plus he offers versatility going back (indeed he could probably fit easily into seven of the eleven positions if required). Theo Walcott might have the electric pace but he lacks the final product, and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain is probably a better shout for 2014. I think that Walcott might find himself on the unfortunate end of a dropping for the second international tournament running unless he can find some electric club form because Capello will want a squad for all scenarios and the likes of Milner give a lot more.

    Meanwhile spare a thought for Matt Jarvis, incredibly an England cap winner in the last year to little fan fare (if only his much-lauded move to Liverpool had come off), and Aaron Lennon, who Capello now seems permanently out of love with. I’m sure he’ll be ok come next autumn should ‘Arry take over.

    LW: Ashley Young

    England’s player of 2011, and the man who makes our attacking offering look a lot more dangerous. Stewart Downing has had a good 18 months but it’s his former team mate who provides a spark and looks a lot more like he’s going to do something special.

    A lot will depend on Young’s fitness (it seems to blight a lot of this team) but when he’s fit and on form he’s top quality. He’s shown great tenacity for United so far this season and this could be his tournament. He and Downing will almost certainly go but it’s worth an outside bet on Joe Cole. He looks rejuvenated playing for Lille and he could offer England that little bit of genius they’ll miss without Rooney.

    God I sound like a tabloid hack calling for Michael Owen to go.

    ST: Danny Welbeck

    Darren Bent will probably start, and I’d say Zamora is probably ahead in the pecking order, but I think it could be Danny Welbeck.

    Same again…he’s a bit injury prone and a lot will depend upon that and how often he features for United, but Welbeck is the man to step up and do an Owen 98 or Rooney 04. He’s quick, skilful, good in the air and scores goals as well as creating them, and if he starts the tournament well he can link up easily with Rooney upon his return.

    Zamora is the man to play a Heskey “doesn’t score but offers a lot of endeavour and link play” role, Darren Bent scores but won’t have anything in his arsenal to test the Spains, Hollands or Germanys. Then you’re looking at Jermain Defoe who seems to be past his peak, Andy Carroll who seems to have gone for lifestyle over success for both England and Liverpool and Daniel Sturridge who really didn’t look like he gave a f*ck against Sweden. Gaby Agbonlahor would be a nice outside bet but is very much a form player and Peter Crouch will probably spend a few years in the international wilderness a la Heskey before returning as a professional nuisance in a few years time.

    So there you have it. On current form my squad would be…

    GK: Joe Hart, Rob Green, John Ruddy

    DF: Chris Smalling, Kyle Walker, Ashley Cole, Leighton Baines, John Terry, Phil Jones, Joleon Lescott, Phil Jagielka

    MF: Scott Parker, Jack Wilshere, Steven Gerrard, Frank Lampard, Gareth Barry, Ashley Young, Stewart Downing, James Milner

    ST: Wayne Rooney, Danny Welbeck, Darren Bent, Bobby Zamora

     
  • Simon Head 10:57 pm on November 15, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: England, ,   

    England win 1-0. Performance was OK, nothing special. Typical international friendly really, players not really flying, but doing just enough to get by. Nice to get back-to-back wins to finish 2011 though. Now the real work starts for Capello. I just hope he has the guts to give the young players the chance to oust some of the older players who have tried – and failed – in major tournaments for England in the past.

     
  • Simon Head 9:50 pm on November 15, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: England, ,   

    Halftime in the England v Sweden game. Observations so far: Sweden dressed in polo gear, Ibrahimovic doing nothing (again) against English opposition, OG scores England’s 2,000th goal, Jones and Rodwell to share a taxi home after two horrendous misses. Bring on the second half…

     
  • The Football Pubcast 12:19 pm on October 25, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: England, , ,   

    PVC: Should Harry Redknapp be the next England manager? 

    They’ve called it “The Impossible Job”, and judging by the performances of England teams in recent international tournaments, England’s recent managers have done a pretty good job of proving that particular title to be true.

    But, with Fabio Capello set to step down after Euro 2012 next summer, who should come in to replace him?

    The name most regularly touted is that of Harry Redknapp. The Spurs boss hasn’t hidden his interest in the England job and his relationship with the press will certainly go some way to improving the goodwill between the papers and the team.

    But is “Happy Harry” really the right man for the job?

    But where do YOU stand on the argument?

    In this week’s instalment of Pitney v Coxon, the series where our two pubcast sparring partners take opposing sides for footballing arguments that we’ve heard (or had) with mates, cab drivers and workmates in the pub.

    Should Harry Redknapp be the next England manager?

    Simon Pitney says YES

    Let me start by clarifying that I don’t think Harry Redknapp is the best manager for England – for sure the claims of Messrs Mourinho, Ferguson and an embattled Wenger would certainly ring far louder and truer than old cheeky chappy ‘Arry. However I do think that Redknapp should be the next England manager – providing the FA lurch once more towards the jingoistic cry for an “Englishman”.

    With such a well defined criteria who are the realistic alternatives? Stuart Pearce has already ruled himself out as not experienced enough, Roy Hodgson still has the look of a man haunted by Anfield, Tony Pulis has done a fantastic job at Stoke, but much like Neil Warnock at QPR is tarnished with “up and at ‘em” approach that last had success in the global game in the late nineteenth century. Plus the latter two can hardly claim that they have been tested at the higher reaches of the game, although the Europaen adventures of Stoke this year are a step in the right direction.

    With all of the above ruled out it only leaves ‘Arry – and lest we forget, this is a man who has taken Spurs into the Champions league and didn’t look fazed. His teams have always played attractive football which given the attritional nature of the game coached by Capello would be a welcome turn of events. With the ever advancing end of the oft called (but should be oft mocked) “golden generation” the next England manager will have to freshen the squad up and find new heroes. Perhaps it ought to be the man who saw the crop of Lampard, Ferdinand, Cole and Defoe (amongst others) through to the professional ranks and has never been afraid of throwing the youngsters in.

    Critics will argue that a) ‘Arry is a wheeler dealer, and for all his notable successes there have always been some real stinkers and that b) until he inherited a very talented but underperforming Spurs team he had never really been more than a middle tier manager. As England manager – he doesn’t need to sign anyone – just do the best with whatever our forefathers seed has bestowed us. As for the latter – it may be true but then look back at all the other contenders and there isn’t a compelling case amongst them. Last English manager to win a major trophy, plays good football, gives youth a chance and has handled some big egos – which other Englishman can say that?

    He may not be the best manager England could have, but he’s the best English manager England can have. Unless Peter Reid gets the job. That’s a joke.

    Mike Coxon says NO

    If ‘arry Redknapp becomes England manager I will officially stop supporting England.

    I got my first England kit for my 5th birthday at the start of Euro 92. I remember Lineker being substituted, the disappointment of USA 94 (but what a goal by Ray ‘oughton) and the shame of Lansdowne Road. I remember the booing of Neville, Butt, Scholes and Beckham in 1997 for the crime of being United players and the booing of Beckham in 1998 for the shame of reacting to extreme provocation. I remember Eileen Drewery, slurs on disabled people and Keegan resigning in the showers. I remember the turgid Sven years (indeed, the best years of my England supporting life), the defeat at Windsor Park and the Wally with the Brolly. Most recently I remember South Africa. I’ve not always loved England or our players (the depressing Golden Generation springs to mind) but I’ve always kept the faith.

    But ‘arry Redknapp would be a wrong turn. And I know, I know, I’ve been vocal in my disdain for ‘Arry in the past. And I do admit, ‘e ‘as done a good job at Spurs. But could ‘e really ‘ave done worse? ‘e’s ‘appy to remind us that when ‘e took over Spurs had 2 points from 8 games. They also ‘ad an expensively assembled squad that in the past three seasons ‘ad fininshed 5th twice and won the Carling Cup.

    ‘arry apparently is a marvellous “wheeler-dealer”. But for every Di Canio and Kanoute there’s a Soma or Boogers. And ‘e wastes talent. Look at the likes of Taarabt, who ‘ad to leave before fulfilling their potential, or Chris Gunter who was massively ‘ighly rated but ultimately wasted. ‘ell, look at the whole West Ham team from the mid-90s onwards. Ferdinand, Lampard, Carrick, Cole, ‘islop, Di Canio, Kanoute, Ian Wright, ‘artson, Kitson, Dicks, Stuart Pearce…this was a squad that could ‘ave challenged every year for a top 4 place but never managed it.

    Fans of ‘is former clubs ‘ate ‘im. Supporters of West ‘am, Southampton and Portsmouth (twice) have been screwed by him. If ‘e doesn’t ‘ave potential to be a new Don Revie then I don’t know who does.

    Alternatives? I’d punt for Martin O’Neill or Roy ‘odgson. And if one particularly interesting rumour is to be believed, I’ve always thought that Arsene knows…

    Oh, and in case you ‘aven’t noticed…’e doesn’t pronounce ‘is bloody “h’s”!

    Whose side are you on? Vote now!

    Which Pubcaster do you agree with? Should Harry be England’s next manager after Fabio Capello? Register your vote using the poll below and we’ll announce the results on the next column. Also, feel free to add your thoughts and comments on the issue by using the comments box at the foot of this article.

    LAST TIME ON PVC: Should the Champions League be reserved for championss only?
    35% said YES
    65% said NO

    Score: Pitney 2-0 Coxon

     
    • Aicher 1:08 pm on October 25, 2011 Permalink

      AS A SPURS FAN I WOULD BE GUTTED IF ARRY WAS TO BECOME ENGLAND MANAGER, NOT BECAUSE I AM UNPATRIOTIC BUT FIRST AND FOREMOST I AM A SPURS FAN.
      I NEW WHEN ARRY TOOK OVER AT SPURS IT WOULD TAKE AT LEAST 3 YEARS FOR HIM TO ASSEMBLE THE SQUAD NEEDED TO CHALLENGE ANY OF THE TOP 4. THIS IS INDEED HIS 3RD YEAR AT SPURS AND WE ARE NOW AT THE BEGINNING THE FRUITS OF HIS LABOUR
      SPURS NOW HAVE A BRILLIANT SQUAD OF PLAYERS AND FOR THE FIRST TIME IT LOOKS AS IF WE ARE NOW THE DOMINANT FORCE IN NORTH LONDON, AND WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO SAY THAT FOR MANY A YEAR
      NOT ONLY THAT, BUT I FEEL REDKNAPP HAS A GIFT FOR SPOTTING GOOD PLAYERS!
      AND THAT ONE THING WOULD BE A WASTE, TO LOSE IT ON A BUNCH OF OVERPAID PREMADONNAS, THAT HAVE NO RESPECT FOR YOU BECAUSE OF THE MONEY THEY EARN. BUT THEY ARE NO GOOD ANYWAY
      I THINK REDKNAPP LOVES IT AT SPURS, TO THE POINT THAT, I HAVE A SNEEKING FEELING, EVEN IF REDKNAPP IS JUST BY CHANCE, OFFERED THE ENGLAND JOB, HE WILL REFUSE IT.
      AND ANYWAY CERTAIN FUTURE COURT CASES MAY WELL EXCLUDE HIM ANYWAY, I HOPE SO. THEN WE CAN WATCH SPURS FLOURISH

    • JOHNNY 1:25 pm on October 25, 2011 Permalink

      I am an Ulsterman and a long time Spurs Supporter firstly i would love change at my beloved Spurs ie Carlo Anchelotti if spelt correctly to be signed for Spurs and you can have Harry , now i don`t dislike Harry one bit infact the job he has done for us has been great but i believe he can`t take Spurs any futher tactically so for that reason Mr Levy should not let Harry buy any more players incase the manager in waiting would prefer his own squad of new players , so thanks Harry for the good times and from an Ulsterman whose team last won the Home International`s I wish Harry great fortune and Spurs all the Georgie Best IN THE 2012 SEASON and ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • The Football Pubcast 9:49 am on September 14, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: England,   

    PVC: Pitney vs Coxon – Are England really the world’s fourth-best side? 

    The recently-published FIFA World Rankings have England listed in fourth place, behind Holland, Spain and Germany, but above Uruguay, Brazil, Italy, Portugal and Argentina.

    FIFA World Rankings – Top 10
    1. Holland
    2. Spain
    3. Germany
    4. England
    5. Uruguay
    6. Brazil
    7. Italy
    8. Portugal
    9. Argentina
    10. Croatia

    Is that a fair assessment of England’s standing in international football, or are the FIFA rankings flawed?

    In the first article in a new regular feature, Pubcasters Simon Pitney and Michael Coxon take opposing sides to a footballing argument and debate the case for and against.

    We’ve called it Pitney vs Coxon, or PVC, if you’re into that sort of thing…

    Should England be ranked fourth in the world?

    Michael Coxon says YES

    It seems fashionable to knock England because, well, they are a bit rubbish at times. But the recent outpouring of bile about their FIFA ranking is ridiculous because England DO deserve to be the 4th in the rankings.

    Why? Well it’s certainly not because the players are better than those of Brazil or Argentina or Italy or even Uruguay, but because the results don’t lie.

    We all saw the 2010 World Cup where England were outclassed by Germany and matched by USA, but you can’t base these things on a month. The rankings are based upon the last 4 years, years that have seen England steamroll two qualifying groups and along the way beat Germany, Denmark and Croatia and draw with Holland. Very few nations have had such a record in that time and it’s reflected in Capello having the highest win percentage of any England manager ever. He may not be the best but he’s effective at churning out narrow wins.

    But England don’t perform like the 4th best team in the world, you say? Well, can you really measure a good performance? Unless you have a big, complicated formula taking into account possession, shots, goals, territory, refereeing decisions and Cruyff turns performed by the wingers then no, you can’t. England are effective and consistent, whereas teams like Brazil and Argentina are far more prone to the occasional defeat to a lesser team (as Bolivia’s stunning 6-1 victory of Argentina in the 2010 qualifiers illustrates).

    Alternatives? Well the place finished at the World Cup only takes into account 32 teams and the ELO rankings seem to be more weighted on historical factors (not that I’m nearly qualified enough to comment). The FIFA rankings aren’t perfect, but they’re as good as we can get. And if they show England as 4th? All the better!

    Simon Pitney says NO

    I accept there is no perfect system for rankings – there will always be anomalies – but this doesn’t mean that I have to accept that England are the fourth best team in the world when my eyes tell me something completely different.

    England under Capello have sailed untroubled through two qualifying groups and have performed reasonably well in some friendlies in recent years (Germany, Holland) – however I would argue that both of these are massively misleading. First of all, the UEFA seeding system prevents top teams ever having to face each other – lets be honest England have had two relatively easy qualifying groups with which to inflate their rankings totals – I would wager quite heavily that if they had to endure playing real top class opposition they would struggle to look so sublime – for example if they had to undergo the same process as their South American counterparts, where there is no dodging games against Argentina, Brazil and a resurgent Uruguay, I would fully expect England to lose their fair share of games. They have been protected by a system that ensures they will play mediocre teams and therefore remain “statistically” one of the worlds top teams.

    As for the friendlies argument – well we have also been embarrassed by Spain and Brazil as well as losing to a French team that is some way short of the standards reached at the turn of the century. Friendlies – you win some you lose some – it doesn’t really matter.

    What does matter is the nitty gritty of winning tournament games – something England failed to do with any aplomb in the most recent World Cup – despite having ,on paper, the easiest group. Once we came up against a decent German team (who we beat in an important friendly) we were completely torn to shreds – a World Cup win has to mean SO much more than a friendly.

    I like Capello and I do believe England are a decent team that is probably about 10th in the world – but when was the last time England really did anything at a tournament? (Then look at all the teams around them in the rankings and ask the same question) When was the last time they came through a particularly tough qualifying group? Do you really believe that if England played Brazil, Argentina or Uruguay ten times they would win the majority of the matches? What about Portugal? Italy? I’d rather bet your mortgage than mine.

    Whose side are you on? Vote now!

    Which Pubcaster do you agree with? Should England be ranked fourth in the world? Register your vote using the poll below and we’ll announce the results in a future Pubcast. Also, feel free to add your thoughts and comments on the issue by using the comments box at the foot of this article.

     
  • The Football Pubcast 1:35 pm on January 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: England, home nations, , , , ,   

    Home Internationals – why not? 

    New Football Association sponsors Vauxhall have suggested re-introducing the Home Internationals in to the football calendar. This has been met with a predictably cool reaction, but with a few tweaks, the idea could well work. Here’s James Welham

    Invite the Republic of Ireland
    True, they’re not a ‘home’ nation, but they’re part of the British Isles and one would hope that we’re no longer in danger of witnessing the horrible scenes that resulted in their friendly with England back in 1995 to be abandoned.

    Set it for the “gap” years
    An annual tournament is too much; after all there is a European Championship and World Cup every other year. However, we all know how depressing those alternate years without big tournaments are, so let’s line it up for the ‘odd’ years.

    Host it during a fortnight
    The tournament could easily be held over a two week period; three Saturdays and two Wednesdays. Every team gets to take one matchday off and the hosts get to choose which one they would like to take off. What? The hosts? What are you talking about? Ah, I see….

    Have a “host nation”
    Rather than a series of home and away games like the Six Nations, each team should take turns to host the tournament, giving a fantastic boost to smaller nations that are unlikely to ever host a major championship (like, you know, England). The host nation would play all their games at the same ground, whilst the other games could be spread around the country.

    Head-to-head tiebreaks
    If teams are tied on points, head-to-head is the first tie-breaker. It’s foolish to have a team finish above another in such a small league if they have lost to them.

    Proper competition rules
    Only three substitutes per team being a particularly important one in order to maintain the integrity of the event.

    A sample schedule for a tournament held in Scotland could be:
    Saturday: Scotland vs Northern Ireland (Hampden), Wales vs England (Tynecastle)
    Wednesday: Scotland vs England (Hampden), Wales vs Republic of Ireland (Easter Road)
    Saturday: England vs Republic of Ireland (Hampden), Wales vs Northern Ireland (Rugby Park)
    Wednesday: Scotland vs Wales (Hampden), Northern Ireland vs Republic of Ireland (Pittodrie)
    Saturday: Scotland vs Republic of Ireland (Hampden), England vs Northern Ireland (Tannadice)

    This competition is unlikely to be met with great enthusiasm from the clubs, but they could be mollified by the international sides agreeing to take a limit of two or three players per team. Also, by being involved in this tournament, the respective football associations could agree to have fewer friendly matches during the season, which would be well received by the clubs.

    Furthermore, this competition would give teams the ideal opportunity to blood younger players in a competitive environment – rightly or wrongly, a young Scottish player is going to be more ‘up’ for a game against England than a friendly against Slovenia.

    So, England vs Wales in Cork? Alex Ferguson won’t like it, but I’ll be watching.

    Follow James on Twitter @jameswelham

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel